Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 March 2012

  • curprev 19:4519:45, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,099 bytes −366 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 19:2519:25, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,465 bytes +328 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 18:4818:48, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,137 bytes +152 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 18:1018:10, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 985 bytes −146 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 17:3617:36, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,131 bytes −39 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 17:3317:33, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,170 bytes −44 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 16:5916:59, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,214 bytes +10 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 16:5916:59, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,204 bytes +133 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 16:2416:24, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,071 bytes −185 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 16:2416:24, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,256 bytes +114 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 15:5015:50, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,142 bytes +61 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 15:4815:48, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,081 bytes −45 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 15:1615:16, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,126 bytes −167 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 15:1215:12, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,293 bytes +118 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 14:4314:43, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,175 bytes +32 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://g
  • curprev 14:3814:38, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,143 bytes −103 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 14:1014:10, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,246 bytes +169 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 14:0314:03, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,077 bytes +9 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 13:3713:37, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,068 bytes −4 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 13:2713:27, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,072 bytes −299 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 13:0313:03, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,371 bytes +194 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 12:5112:51, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,177 bytes +336 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 12:2912:29, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 841 bytes −415 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://vnudebnakedfsex.insanejournal.com catherine bell na
  • curprev 12:1712:17, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,256 bytes +269 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 11:5611:56, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 987 bytes −260 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 11:4211:42, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,247 bytes +328 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 11:2211:22, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 919 bytes −169 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 11:0811:08, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,088 bytes −11 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://smeganfoxboobs2.tumblr.com megan fox boobs, :),
  • curprev 10:4910:49, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,099 bytes −85 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 10:2910:29, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,184 bytes +14 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 10:0710:07, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,170 bytes +195 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 09:5309:53, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 975 bytes −168 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 09:3309:33, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,143 bytes −27 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 09:1809:18, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,170 bytes +31 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 09:0109:01, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,139 bytes +23 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 08:4308:43, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,116 bytes −145 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 08:2708:27, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,261 bytes +119 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 08:0808:08, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,142 bytes −93 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 07:5407:54, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,235 bytes +68 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 07:3507:35, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,167 bytes +199 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 07:2407:24, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 968 bytes −56 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 07:0507:05, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,024 bytes −142 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 06:5006:50, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,166 bytes −48 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 06:3006:30, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,214 bytes +313 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 901 bytes −221 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 05:5605:56, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,122 bytes −124 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 05:3505:35, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,246 bytes +220 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 05:3105:31, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,026 bytes +75 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 05:0205:02, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 951 bytes −318 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 04:5804:58, 27 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,269 bytes +28 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"