Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 March 2012

  • curprev 09:4409:44, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,068 bytes +52 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 09:1409:14, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,016 bytes +27 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 09:0909:09, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 989 bytes −77 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 08:4008:40, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,066 bytes +39 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 08:3408:34, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,027 bytes −276 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 08:0508:05, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,303 bytes +125 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 08:0008:00, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,178 bytes −62 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 07:3307:33, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,240 bytes +49 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 07:2807:28, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,191 bytes +76 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 07:0207:02, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,115 bytes +11 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 06:5806:58, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,104 bytes +28 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 06:3006:30, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,076 bytes −42 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://l
  • curprev 06:2306:23, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,118 bytes +73 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 05:5805:58, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,045 bytes +123 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 05:5005:50, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 922 bytes −293 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 05:2405:24, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,215 bytes +328 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 05:1605:16, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 887 bytes −102 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 04:5104:51, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 989 bytes −14 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 04:4204:42, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,003 bytes −276 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://elishacuthbertnude4.typepad.com Elisha Cuthbert Nude, azpg
  • curprev 04:1704:17, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,279 bytes +77 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 04:0804:08, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,202 bytes +318 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 03:4503:45, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 884 bytes −326 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 03:3403:34, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,210 bytes +79 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 03:1203:12, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,131 bytes 0 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 02:5802:58, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,131 bytes +192 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 02:3902:39, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 939 bytes −437 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://cnudepnakedbsex.insanejournal.com Sofia Vergara Por
  • curprev 02:2502:25, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,376 bytes +499 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 02:0402:04, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 877 bytes −190 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 01:5101:51, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,067 bytes +46 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 01:3101:31, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,021 bytes −197 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://onudeknakedcsex.insanejournal.com Adriana Lima Nu
  • curprev 01:1701:17, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,218 bytes +27 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 00:5800:58, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,191 bytes +348 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 00:4500:45, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 843 bytes −382 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://onudemnakedhsex.insanejournal.com Selena Gomez Fa
  • curprev 00:2700:27, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,225 bytes +326 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 00:1300:13, 19 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 899 bytes −160 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:

18 March 2012

  • curprev 23:5423:54, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,059 bytes +64 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://cnudeknakedlsex.insanejournal.com Kelly Kelly Porn,
  • curprev 23:4123:41, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 995 bytes −42 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://coconude4.typepad.com Coco Nude, 0456, http://mariaozawap
  • curprev 23:2223:22, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,037 bytes +167 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 23:0823:08, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 870 bytes −283 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://vkimkardashiannudee.tumblr.com Kim Kardashian Nud
  • curprev 22:4822:48, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,153 bytes +153 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 22:3422:34, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,000 bytes −231 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 22:1522:15, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,231 bytes −116 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 22:0222:02, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,347 bytes +48 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 21:4321:43, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,299 bytes +339 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 21:3021:30, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 960 bytes +12 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://evalongorianude3.typepad.com Eva Longoria Nude, qhhtec, h
  • curprev 21:1021:10, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 948 bytes −260 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 20:5920:59, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,208 bytes +310 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 20:3820:38, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 898 bytes −36 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 20:2720:27, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 934 bytes −181 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 20:0420:04, 18 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,115 bytes −53 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"