Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 March 2012

  • curprev 06:4306:43, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 990 bytes −144 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 06:3706:37, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,134 bytes +106 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 06:1206:12, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,028 bytes −417 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 06:0606:06, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,445 bytes +431 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 05:4205:42, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,014 bytes +150 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 05:3505:35, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 864 bytes −200 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 05:1205:12, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,064 bytes +53 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 05:0405:04, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,011 bytes −188 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 04:4204:42, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,199 bytes +53 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 04:3404:34, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,146 bytes −18 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://femmawatsonn.freeforu
  • curprev 04:1104:11, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,164 bytes +251 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 04:0404:04, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 913 bytes −160 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 03:4003:40, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,073 bytes +201 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 03:3203:32, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 872 bytes −277 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 03:0903:09, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,149 bytes +81 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 03:0103:01, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,068 bytes +89 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://jsunnyleones.freeforu
  • curprev 02:3902:39, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 979 bytes −66 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 02:3102:31, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,045 bytes −32 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 02:0802:08, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,077 bytes −38 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 01:5901:59, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,115 bytes +273 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://q
  • curprev 01:3801:38, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 842 bytes −36 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 01:2901:29, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 878 bytes −89 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 01:0801:08, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 967 bytes +86 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 00:5900:59, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 881 bytes −81 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://znudeunakeddsex.insanejournal.com Sandra Bullock
  • curprev 00:3800:38, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 962 bytes −42 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://zkellykellyh.freeforums.org Kelly Kelly Naked, uumik, http
  • curprev 00:2800:28, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,004 bytes −74 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 00:0800:08, 3 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,078 bytes −95 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion

2 March 2012

  • curprev 23:5623:56, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,173 bytes −197 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 23:3723:37, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,370 bytes +330 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 23:2623:26, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,040 bytes −138 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 23:0723:07, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,178 bytes +37 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 22:5622:56, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,141 bytes −221 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 22:3822:38, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,362 bytes +248 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 22:2522:25, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,114 bytes −28 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 22:0822:08, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,142 bytes +42 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 21:5421:54, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,100 bytes −159 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 21:3721:37, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,259 bytes +92 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 21:2321:23, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,167 bytes +30 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 21:0721:07, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,137 bytes −123 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 20:5020:50, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,260 bytes +424 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 20:3720:37, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 836 bytes −605 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://anudeynakedusex.insanejournal.com Meagan Good Nak
  • curprev 20:1920:19, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,441 bytes +469 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 20:0720:07, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 972 bytes −40 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 19:4819:48, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,012 bytes −344 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://uzoesaldananakedr.tumblr.com Zoe Saldana Naked,
  • curprev 19:3719:37, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,356 bytes +330 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 19:1819:18, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,026 bytes +138 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 19:0619:06, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 888 bytes −349 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 18:4718:47, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,237 bytes +231 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 18:3518:35, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,006 bytes −275 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 18:1718:17, 2 March 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,281 bytes +280 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"