Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

12 February 2012

  • curprev 23:3323:33, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,045 bytes −201 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 23:0923:09, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,246 bytes +376 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 23:0123:01, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 870 bytes −166 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 22:3922:39, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,036 bytes +22 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 22:3122:31, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,014 bytes −59 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://cjennettemccurdyz.freeforums.org jennette mccurdy p
  • curprev 22:1022:10, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,073 bytes +14 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 22:0022:00, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,059 bytes +146 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 21:3821:38, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 913 bytes −85 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 21:2921:29, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 998 bytes −452 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 21:0821:08, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,450 bytes +504 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 20:5720:57, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 946 bytes −6 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 20:3620:36, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 952 bytes −178 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://skellykellynakedb.tumblr.com kelly kelly naked,
  • curprev 20:2520:25, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,130 bytes +87 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 20:0620:06, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,043 bytes −220 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 19:3619:36, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,263 bytes +410 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 19:2219:22, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 853 bytes −214 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 19:0719:07, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,067 bytes +5 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://tmariahcareyc.freeforums.org mariah carey
  • curprev 18:5118:51, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,062 bytes −63 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 18:3518:35, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,125 bytes +122 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 18:1818:18, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,003 bytes −191 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 18:0318:03, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,194 bytes +71 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 17:4617:46, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,123 bytes +112 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 17:3317:33, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,011 bytes −153 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 17:1517:15, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,164 bytes +283 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 17:0217:02, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 881 bytes −83 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://spamelaandersonsextapej.tumblr.com pamela anderson sex tap
  • curprev 16:4416:44, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 964 bytes −74 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 16:3216:32, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,038 bytes −115 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://bkimkardashiannakedy.tumblr.com kim kardashian nake
  • curprev 16:1216:12, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,153 bytes +351 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 16:0016:00, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 802 bytes −246 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://kmariahcareyj.freeforums.org mariah carey naked, nyxofl, h
  • curprev 15:4115:41, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,048 bytes −209 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://lkatrinakaifa.freeforums.org katrina kaif nude, rt
  • curprev 15:2915:29, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,257 bytes +294 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 15:0915:09, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 963 bytes −316 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 14:5814:58, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,279 bytes +259 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 14:3614:36, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,020 bytes −365 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 14:2614:26, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,385 bytes +523 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 14:0514:05, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 862 bytes −340 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://skendrawilkinsonq.freeforums.org kendra wilkinson sex tape,
  • curprev 13:5313:53, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,202 bytes +181 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 13:3413:34, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,021 bytes −317 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 13:0113:01, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,338 bytes +246 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 12:5112:51, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,092 bytes −11 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://xvictoriajusticem.freeforums.org victoria justice nude, 8
  • curprev 12:2912:29, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,103 bytes −128 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 12:2012:20, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,231 bytes −179 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 11:5811:58, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,410 bytes +345 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 11:4811:48, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,065 bytes −57 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 11:2611:26, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,122 bytes −70 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 11:1811:18, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,192 bytes +92 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 10:5310:53, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,100 bytes −6 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 10:4610:46, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,106 bytes −49 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 10:2210:22, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,155 bytes +181 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 10:1410:14, 12 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 974 bytes +125 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"