Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 February 2012

  • curprev 16:2016:20, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,021 bytes −44 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 15:5115:51, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,065 bytes +34 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 15:4815:48, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,031 bytes −114 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 15:1915:19, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,145 bytes +19 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 15:1615:16, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,126 bytes −3 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 14:4614:46, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,129 bytes +86 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 14:4414:44, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,043 bytes −85 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 14:1414:14, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,128 bytes +123 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 14:1114:11, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,005 bytes −120 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://lpauleyperretteq.freeforums.org pauley perrette nude, :-[,
  • curprev 13:4213:42, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,125 bytes +89 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 13:3913:39, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,036 bytes −50 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://omeganfoxq.freeforums.org megan fox naked, >:-[[
  • curprev 13:1013:10, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,086 bytes +4 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 13:0713:07, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,082 bytes +17 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://r
  • curprev 12:3812:38, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,065 bytes −23 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://jjennifercoolidgef.freeforums.org jennifer coolidge naked,
  • curprev 12:3512:35, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,088 bytes +222 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 12:0512:05, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 866 bytes −240 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 12:0412:04, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,106 bytes +258 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 11:3411:34, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 848 bytes −178 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 11:3211:32, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,026 bytes +158 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 11:0311:03, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 868 bytes −376 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dkeiraknightleys.freeforums.org keira knightley n
  • curprev 11:0011:00, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,244 bytes +358 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 10:3110:31, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 886 bytes +36 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://akellybrookr.freeforums.org kelly brook nude, 168220, http
  • curprev 10:2910:29, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 850 bytes −178 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://ubrooklyndeckerg.freeforums.org brooklyn decker nud
  • curprev 09:5909:59, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,028 bytes +90 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://zcamerondiazpornl.tumblr.com cameron diaz porn, 9789, htt
  • curprev 09:5809:58, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 938 bytes −47 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://cmirandakerrnudei.tumblr.com miranda kerr nude,
  • curprev 09:2909:29, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 985 bytes −282 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 09:2709:27, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,267 bytes +304 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 08:5608:56, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 963 bytes −118 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 08:5508:55, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,081 bytes −125 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 08:2408:24, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,206 bytes +123 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 08:2308:23, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,083 bytes +25 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 07:5307:53, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,058 bytes +83 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 07:5007:50, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 975 bytes −484 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://c
  • curprev 07:2307:23, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,459 bytes +24 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 07:1907:19, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,435 bytes +377 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 06:5006:50, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,058 bytes −147 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 06:4706:47, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,205 bytes +187 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 06:1706:17, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,018 bytes −55 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,073 bytes +63 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://xkimkardashianr.freeforums.org kim kardashian ful
  • curprev 05:4605:46, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,010 bytes −60 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://tpaulapattonnudee.tum
  • curprev 05:4305:43, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,070 bytes −240 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 05:1405:14, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,310 bytes +352 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 05:1305:13, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 958 bytes −205 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 04:4304:43, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,163 bytes +249 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 04:4104:41, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 914 bytes +34 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://vrashidajonesnudek.tumblr.com rashida jones nude, 916, ht
  • curprev 04:1204:12, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 880 bytes +16 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 04:1004:10, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 864 bytes +36 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 03:4103:41, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 828 bytes −302 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://utorriewilsonnuded.tumblr.com torrie wilson nude,
  • curprev 03:3903:39, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,130 bytes +190 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 03:1003:10, 7 February 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 940 bytes −54 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"