Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 January 2012

  • curprev 10:3510:35, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 666 bytes −180 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://k
  • curprev 10:0910:09, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 846 bytes +33 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 10:0410:04, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 813 bytes −220 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 09:3909:39, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,033 bytes +210 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 09:3309:33, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 823 bytes −339 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 09:0809:08, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,162 bytes +552 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 09:0309:03, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 610 bytes −172 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 08:3908:39, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 782 bytes +62 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://natalieportmannudeaz.tumblr.com natalie portman nud
  • curprev 08:3408:34, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 720 bytes −69 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://christinaaguileraporn
  • curprev 08:0908:09, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 789 bytes −28 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 08:0508:05, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 817 bytes +181 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 07:4107:41, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 636 bytes −191 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://leonardodicaprionakedch.tumblr.com leonardo dicaprio naked,
  • curprev 07:3507:35, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 827 bytes −114 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 07:1107:11, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 941 bytes −117 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 07:0707:07, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,058 bytes +301 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 06:4006:40, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 757 bytes −24 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 06:3706:37, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 781 bytes +303 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 06:1006:10, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 478 bytes −149 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://bridgetmarquardtnudepc.tumblr.com bridget marquardt nude,
  • curprev 06:0706:07, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 627 bytes −210 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 05:4105:41, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 837 bytes +300 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 05:3705:37, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 537 bytes +7 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://millajovovichnakedhz.tumblr.com milla jovovich nake
  • curprev 05:1105:11, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 530 bytes −213 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://yvonnestrahovskinakedww.tumblr.com yvonne strahov
  • curprev 05:0705:07, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 743 bytes −225 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 04:4204:42, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 968 bytes +308 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 04:3704:37, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 660 bytes −385 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 04:1404:14, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,045 bytes +340 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 04:0704:07, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 705 bytes −17 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 03:4503:45, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 722 bytes +120 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://lizvasseynuderh.tumblr.com liz vassey nude, 8[[[,
  • curprev 03:3803:38, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 602 bytes +6 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 03:1603:16, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 596 bytes −352 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 03:0803:08, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 948 bytes +14 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 02:4802:48, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 934 bytes +82 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 02:3702:37, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 852 bytes +138 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 02:2002:20, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 714 bytes −38 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 02:0602:06, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 752 bytes −195 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 01:4901:49, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 947 bytes +76 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 01:3601:36, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 871 bytes +269 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 01:2001:20, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 602 bytes −144 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://carlaguginosexhh.tumblr.com carla gugino sex, da
  • curprev 01:0701:07, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 746 bytes −72 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 00:5100:51, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 818 bytes +117 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 00:3800:38, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 701 bytes +168 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 00:2200:22, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 533 bytes −314 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 00:1000:10, 20 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 847 bytes +306 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion

19 January 2012

  • curprev 23:5423:54, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 541 bytes −44 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://kristindavissexvideopx.tumblr.com kristin
  • curprev 23:4323:43, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 585 bytes −124 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://k
  • curprev 23:2423:24, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 709 bytes +18 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 23:1323:13, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 691 bytes −119 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 22:5622:56, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 810 bytes +22 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 22:4522:45, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 788 bytes +99 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 22:2622:26, 19 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 689 bytes +25 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)