Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

15 January 2012

  • curprev 02:0602:06, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 786 bytes −149 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 02:0302:03, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 935 bytes +247 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 01:3501:35, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 688 bytes −36 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 01:3201:32, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 724 bytes −86 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 01:0601:06, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 810 bytes +184 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 01:0201:02, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 626 bytes −46 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 00:3800:38, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 672 bytes −18 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 00:3300:33, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 690 bytes +7 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 00:0800:08, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 683 bytes −253 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 00:0400:04, 15 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 936 bytes +175 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac

14 January 2012

  • curprev 23:3823:38, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 761 bytes +91 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://melissajoanhartnudesg
  • curprev 23:3523:35, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 670 bytes −121 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://heathergrahamsexcc.tumblr.com heather graham sex,
  • curprev 23:0923:09, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 791 bytes +23 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 23:0723:07, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 768 bytes +31 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 22:3922:39, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 737 bytes +13 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 22:1222:12, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 724 bytes −2 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 22:1022:10, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 726 bytes −25 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 21:4321:43, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 751 bytes +3 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 21:3921:39, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 748 bytes −393 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 21:1421:14, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,141 bytes +34 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 21:0921:09, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,107 bytes +375 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 20:4520:45, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 732 bytes −132 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 20:3820:38, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 864 bytes +327 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 20:1620:16, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 537 bytes −200 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 20:0720:07, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 737 bytes +185 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 19:4619:46, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 552 bytes −6 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 19:1619:16, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 558 bytes −97 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://christinahendricksbreastxr.tumblr.com christina hendricks b
  • curprev 19:0419:04, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 655 bytes −11 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 18:4618:46, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 666 bytes −39 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 18:3418:34, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 705 bytes +52 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 18:1718:17, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 653 bytes +108 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 18:0318:03, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 545 bytes −3 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://j
  • curprev 17:4617:46, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 548 bytes −334 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 17:3317:33, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 882 bytes −138 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 17:1617:16, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,020 bytes +215 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 17:0117:01, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 805 bytes +244 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 16:4416:44, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 561 bytes +24 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://vanessahudgensdesnudacl.tumblr.com vanessa hudgens
  • curprev 16:2816:28, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 537 bytes +12 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 15:5715:57, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 525 bytes −250 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://rihannapussymn.tumblr.com rihanna pussy, 875, http
  • curprev 15:2515:25, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 775 bytes +239 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 14:5414:54, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 536 bytes −200 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 14:2314:23, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 736 bytes −77 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 13:5113:51, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 813 bytes −121 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 13:2113:21, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 934 bytes −30 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 12:4912:49, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 964 bytes +386 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 12:1712:17, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 578 bytes −395 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jennifergarnersexzg.tumblr.com jennifer g
  • curprev 11:4711:47, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 973 bytes +341 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 11:1611:16, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 632 bytes +60 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://adrianalimasextapenf.tumblr.com adriana lima sex tape, lwe
  • curprev 10:4510:45, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 572 bytes −591 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 10:1510:15, 14 January 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,163 bytes +589 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"