Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 December 2011

  • curprev 03:1403:14, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 718 bytes +107 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 02:5002:50, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 611 bytes −244 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 02:4502:45, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 855 bytes +177 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 02:2202:22, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 678 bytes +32 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 02:1802:18, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 646 bytes +23 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 01:5501:55, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 623 bytes −152 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 01:5201:52, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 775 bytes +201 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 01:2701:27, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 574 bytes −105 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://brookeburkenakedju.tumblr.com brooke burke naked, 8-)), ht
  • curprev 01:2601:26, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 679 bytes +23 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 01:0001:00, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 656 bytes −202 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 00:5800:58, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 858 bytes +73 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 00:3200:32, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 785 bytes −30 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 00:3200:32, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 815 bytes −144 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 00:0600:06, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 959 bytes −183 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 00:0400:04, 22 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,142 bytes +511 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in

21 December 2011

  • curprev 23:4023:40, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 631 bytes −210 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 23:3823:38, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 841 bytes +162 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 23:1323:13, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 679 bytes −229 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 23:1123:11, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 908 bytes +60 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 22:4522:45, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 848 bytes +279 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 22:4422:44, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 569 bytes −247 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 22:1822:18, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 816 bytes +196 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 22:1822:18, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 620 bytes −318 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://mandirabeditoplesszg.tumblr.com mandira bedi topl
  • curprev 21:5121:51, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 938 bytes −67 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 21:5021:50, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,005 bytes −3 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 21:2321:23, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,008 bytes +359 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 21:2221:22, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 649 bytes −38 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 20:5620:56, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 687 bytes −226 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 20:5520:55, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 913 bytes +238 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 20:2920:29, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 675 bytes −186 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 20:2820:28, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 861 bytes +376 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 20:0220:02, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 485 bytes −341 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://vanessahudgensnudephotosll.tumblr.com vanessa hudge
  • curprev 20:0220:02, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 826 bytes −47 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 19:3419:34, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 873 bytes +21 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 19:3419:34, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 852 bytes −43 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 19:0819:08, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 895 bytes −158 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 19:0719:07, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,053 bytes +319 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 18:4018:40, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 734 bytes +25 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 18:3918:39, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 709 bytes +73 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 18:1318:13, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 636 bytes −106 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://rebeccaromijnnudehz.tumblr.com rebecca romijn nude,
  • curprev 18:1218:12, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 742 bytes +131 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://christinaaguileranakedve.tumblr.com christina aguilera nak
  • curprev 17:4617:46, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 611 bytes −155 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 17:4517:45, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 766 bytes −10 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 17:1717:17, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 776 bytes −12 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 17:1717:17, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 788 bytes +66 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 16:5016:50, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 722 bytes −226 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 16:4916:49, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 948 bytes +256 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 16:2216:22, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 692 bytes +236 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 16:2216:22, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 456 bytes −184 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://dianekrugerhotjo.tumblr.com diane kruger hot, 87
  • curprev 15:5515:55, 21 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 640 bytes −52 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://vidaguerraassdk.tumblr.com vida guerra ass, hlmw, http://
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"