Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

curprev 08:4908:49, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 619 bytes −209 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://scarlettjohanssonbikini1.typepad.com scarlett johansson bik
curprev 08:4608:46, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 828 bytes −44 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
curprev 08:2408:24, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 872 bytes +237 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
curprev 08:2108:21, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 635 bytes −145 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
curprev 07:5807:58, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 780 bytes −115 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
curprev 07:5607:56, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 895 bytes −76 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
curprev 07:3207:32, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 971 bytes +416 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
curprev 07:3007:30, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 555 bytes −562 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
curprev 07:0607:06, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,117 bytes +446 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
curprev 07:0307:03, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 671 bytes −202 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
curprev 06:3906:39, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 873 bytes +201 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
curprev 06:3706:37, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 672 bytes −68 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
curprev 06:1306:13, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 740 bytes −165 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
curprev 06:1006:10, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 905 bytes +207 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
curprev 05:4605:46, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 698 bytes −61 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
curprev 05:4305:43, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 759 bytes +126 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
curprev 05:1905:19, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 633 bytes −242 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
curprev 05:1705:17, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 875 bytes +100 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
curprev 04:5304:53, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 775 bytes −31 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
curprev 04:4904:49, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 806 bytes −39 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
curprev 04:2604:26, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 845 bytes +240 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
curprev 04:2304:23, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 605 bytes +74 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://mckeesowe.livejournal.com CHELSEA HANDLER NAKED, twih, ht
curprev 04:0004:00, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 531 bytes −216 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://shakiraboobs2.typepad.com shakira boobs, 8318, h
curprev 03:5603:56, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 747 bytes +188 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://snudeunakedtsex.insanejournal.com marisa miller nak
curprev 03:3203:32, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 559 bytes −237 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
curprev 03:2903:29, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 796 bytes +143 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
curprev 03:0603:06, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 653 bytes −169 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
curprev 03:0203:02, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 822 bytes +72 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
curprev 02:3902:39, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 750 bytes −35 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
curprev 02:3502:35, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 785 bytes +27 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
curprev 02:1402:14, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 758 bytes −169 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
curprev 02:0802:08, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 927 bytes −61 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
curprev 01:4801:48, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 988 bytes +210 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
curprev 01:4201:42, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 778 bytes +19 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
curprev 01:2201:22, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 759 bytes +57 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
curprev 01:1601:16, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 702 bytes −17 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
curprev 00:5500:55, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 719 bytes +38 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
curprev 00:5100:51, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 681 bytes +127 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
curprev 00:2900:29, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 554 bytes +13 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
curprev 00:2400:24, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 541 bytes −391 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
curprev 00:0400:04, 15 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 932 bytes +243 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's

Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

15 December 2011

14 December 2011

Navigation menu

Search