Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 December 2011

  • curprev 02:3002:30, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 606 bytes −263 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 02:0602:06, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 869 bytes +175 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 02:0202:02, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 694 bytes +7 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 01:3901:39, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 687 bytes −83 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 01:3501:35, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 770 bytes −141 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 01:1201:12, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 911 bytes +359 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 01:0801:08, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 552 bytes +9 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 00:4400:44, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 543 bytes −296 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 00:4100:41, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 839 bytes +101 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 00:1700:17, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 738 bytes −140 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 00:1500:15, 7 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 878 bytes +273 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange

6 December 2011

  • curprev 23:5023:50, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 605 bytes +94 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 23:4823:48, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 511 bytes −312 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://valeriebertinellibikini.typepad.com valerie bertinelli bik
  • curprev 23:2223:22, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 823 bytes +192 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 23:2223:22, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 631 bytes −118 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://tyrabankssextape.type
  • curprev 22:5622:56, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 749 bytes +8 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 22:5522:55, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 741 bytes +48 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 22:2922:29, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 693 bytes +91 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 22:2822:28, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 602 bytes −122 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://jasonsegelnude1.typepad.com jason segel nude, >:
  • curprev 22:0122:01, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 724 bytes −82 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 22:0022:00, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 806 bytes +3 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 21:3421:34, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 803 bytes +109 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 21:3321:33, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 694 bytes −20 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 21:0621:06, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 714 bytes −43 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 21:0521:05, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 757 bytes −122 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 20:3820:38, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 879 bytes +263 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 20:3720:37, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 616 bytes −503 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://raquelalessiplayboy.typepad.com raquel alessi playboy, ez
  • curprev 20:1120:11, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,119 bytes +476 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 20:1120:11, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 643 bytes −36 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 19:4419:44, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 679 bytes +6 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 19:4319:43, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 673 bytes −40 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 19:1719:17, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 713 bytes −408 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://ilaryblasinude.typepad.com ilary blasi nude, zcy
  • curprev 19:1619:16, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,121 bytes +591 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 18:4918:49, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 530 bytes −404 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 18:4818:48, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 934 bytes +260 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 18:2118:21, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 674 bytes −1 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 18:1918:19, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 675 bytes +78 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jenniferellisontopless.typepad.com jennif
  • curprev 17:5417:54, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 597 bytes −444 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 17:5217:52, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,041 bytes +375 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 17:2717:27, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 666 bytes −12 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 17:2417:24, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 678 bytes +75 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 17:0017:00, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 603 bytes −150 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 16:5716:57, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 753 bytes +134 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://audrinapatridgebikini
  • curprev 16:3216:32, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 619 bytes −304 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 16:3016:30, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 923 bytes +297 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 16:0416:04, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 626 bytes −120 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 16:0116:01, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 746 bytes +148 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 15:3615:36, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 598 bytes −220 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://ashleesimpsonsex.typepad.com ashlee simpson sex, 7
  • curprev 15:3215:32, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 818 bytes +6 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 15:0815:08, 6 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 812 bytes −105 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"