Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

3 December 2011

  • curprev 03:0603:06, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 543 bytes −307 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://dianelanehot.typepad.com diane lane hot, 924, http://vict
  • curprev 03:0303:03, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 850 bytes −172 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 02:3702:37, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,022 bytes +87 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 02:3602:36, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 935 bytes +397 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 02:1102:11, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 538 bytes −110 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 02:0902:09, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 648 bytes −112 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://cindycrawfordnaked.typepad.com cindy crawford naked, =-D,
  • curprev 01:4401:44, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 760 bytes +272 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 01:4301:43, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 488 bytes −156 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://vanessaminnillonaked.typepad.com vanessa minnillo
  • curprev 01:1801:18, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 644 bytes −23 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://dianenealnude.typepad.com diane neal nude, 818, http://rav
  • curprev 01:1601:16, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 667 bytes +161 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 00:5000:50, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 506 bytes −300 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://shilpashettysex.typepad.com shilpa shetty sex, adjf, http:
  • curprev 00:5000:50, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 806 bytes +191 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 00:2400:24, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 615 bytes −245 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 00:2300:23, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 860 bytes −91 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 00:0000:00, 3 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 951 bytes +347 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But

2 December 2011

  • curprev 23:5823:58, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 604 bytes −279 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://vikkiblowsporn.typepad.com vikki blows porn, swd
  • curprev 23:3323:33, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 883 bytes +218 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 23:3223:32, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 665 bytes −37 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 23:0823:08, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 702 bytes −3 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://manuelaarcurisex.typepad.com manuela arcuri sex, 12248, ht
  • curprev 23:0623:06, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 705 bytes +89 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://h
  • curprev 22:4322:43, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 616 bytes −401 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://maggiegyllenhaalsexscene.typepad.com maggie gyllenhaal sex
  • curprev 22:4122:41, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,017 bytes +524 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 22:1622:16, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 493 bytes −123 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://carolvordermannude.ty
  • curprev 22:1622:16, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 616 bytes −198 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 21:5121:51, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 814 bytes +169 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 21:5121:51, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 645 bytes −15 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 21:2521:25, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 660 bytes −185 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 21:2521:25, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 845 bytes −18 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 21:0021:00, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 863 bytes −11 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 21:0021:00, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 874 bytes +50 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 20:3620:36, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 824 bytes +96 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 20:3520:35, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 728 bytes −199 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://cindycrawfordsex.typepad.com cindy crawford sex, 7111, htt
  • curprev 20:1120:11, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 927 bytes +193 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 20:1020:10, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 734 bytes +2 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 19:4419:44, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 732 bytes −28 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 19:4319:43, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 760 bytes +120 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 19:1719:17, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 640 bytes −42 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 19:1619:16, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 682 bytes −23 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 18:5018:50, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 705 bytes −73 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 18:5018:50, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 778 bytes +89 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 18:2318:23, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 689 bytes +84 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 18:2318:23, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 605 bytes −82 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 17:5617:56, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 687 bytes −228 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 17:5617:56, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 915 bytes +235 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 17:3017:30, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 680 bytes −214 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 17:2917:29, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 894 bytes +31 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 17:0217:02, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 863 bytes −75 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 17:0117:01, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 938 bytes +272 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 16:3516:35, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 666 bytes −190 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 16:3316:33, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 856 bytes −256 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"