Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

2 December 2011

  • curprev 16:0716:07, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,112 bytes +367 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 16:0616:06, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 745 bytes +58 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://malaikaaroranude.typepad.com malaika arora nude,
  • curprev 15:3915:39, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 687 bytes −206 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 15:3815:38, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 893 bytes +153 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 15:1115:11, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 740 bytes +129 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 15:1115:11, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 611 bytes −152 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://naomiwattsnaked1.type
  • curprev 14:4414:44, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 763 bytes +220 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 14:4214:42, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 543 bytes +74 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 14:1614:16, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 469 bytes −504 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://stephanieprattnude.typepad.com stephanie pratt nu
  • curprev 14:1414:14, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 973 bytes +6 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 13:4713:47, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 967 bytes +423 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 13:4613:46, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 544 bytes −206 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 13:1813:18, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 750 bytes −172 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 13:1813:18, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 922 bytes −56 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 12:5012:50, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 978 bytes +445 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 12:5012:50, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 533 bytes −628 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 12:2212:22, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,161 bytes +232 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 12:2112:21, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 929 bytes +336 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 11:5411:54, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 593 bytes −515 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://joshduhamelnaked1.typepad.com josh duhamel naked,
  • curprev 11:5211:52, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,108 bytes +400 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 11:2611:26, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 708 bytes +70 I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 11:2411:24, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 638 bytes −256 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 10:5810:58, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 894 bytes −219 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 10:5710:57, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 1,113 bytes +607 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 10:2910:29, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 506 bytes −158 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://sarahfergusonnude1.typepad.com sarah ferguson nude,
  • curprev 10:2910:29, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 664 bytes −30 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://nellyfurtadoass.typepad.com nelly furtado ass, vti
  • curprev 10:0110:01, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 694 bytes −84 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 10:0110:01, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 778 bytes +103 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 09:3509:35, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 675 bytes −139 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 09:3309:33, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 814 bytes +265 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 09:0809:08, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 549 bytes −340 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://sarahsilvermansexy.typepad.com sarah silverman se
  • curprev 09:0609:06, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 889 bytes +166 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 08:4208:42, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 723 bytes +193 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 08:3808:38, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 530 bytes −202 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://mariahcareypussy1.typepad.com mariah carey pussy,
  • curprev 08:1408:14, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 732 bytes +86 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 08:0908:09, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 646 bytes −165 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://lilkimass.typepad.com lil kim ass, >:-((
  • curprev 07:4707:47, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 811 bytes +213 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 07:4207:42, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 598 bytes −355 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 07:2107:21, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 953 bytes +379 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 07:1407:14, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 574 bytes −146 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 06:5406:54, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 720 bytes −270 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://juliettelewisnaked1.typepad.com juliette lewis nake
  • curprev 06:4506:45, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 990 bytes +417 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 06:2706:27, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 573 bytes +38 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://ayeshatakianaked1.typ
  • curprev 06:1806:18, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 535 bytes −289 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 06:0006:00, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 824 bytes +52 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 05:5105:51, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 772 bytes +30 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 05:3305:33, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 742 bytes +97 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 05:2405:24, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 645 bytes −208 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 05:0605:06, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.51 talk 853 bytes −232 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 04:5804:58, 2 December 2011 46.21.144.52 talk 1,085 bytes +322 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"