Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 06 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Critical Review) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Critical Review == | == Critical Review == | ||
Based on the design principles recorded by Few [2004], we discovered the following problems in the graphic shown above: | |||
* Data objects with '''3-D depth''' are used. These objects are hard to read. Furthermore, the graphical components added for 3-D depth do not convey any extra information (bad data ink ratio) [Few, 2004, p. 171]. | |||
* Through the use of '''pie charts''', quantitative information is encoded by area. These types of graphs communicate poorly, because the human visual perception cannot accurately estimate the area of a 2-D shapes. In 3-D this is even harder [Few, 2004, p. 60]. | |||
* The numeric values are printed next to the categorical labels. This decreases the '''data-ink ratio'''. If we take into account the two points mentioned above, we can argue that the pie charts are non-data ink and only categorical labels and values are data ink. | |||
* Except for "teachers" all pies are drawn in an '''intense color''' (highly saturated red). This draws a lot of attention to these pies, especially because red signals danger in most western cultures [Few, 2004, p. 171]. However, we think that the graphic's purpose is to highlight the proportion for "teachers". In that case the pie for "teachers" should be more intense [Few, 2004, p. 187]. | |||
* The categorical labels are printed in '''capitals'''. In this form text is less legible. | |||
== Improved Graphic == | == Improved Graphic == | ||
Line 19: | Line 27: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
* [Few, 2004] Stephen Few. Show Me the Numbers - Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. Analytics Press, Oakland, CA, 2004. |
Revision as of 18:58, 7 December 2008
Aufgabenstellung
Zu beurteilende Grafik
Proportion of respondents who attribute 'very great' prestige to professionals
Critical Review
Based on the design principles recorded by Few [2004], we discovered the following problems in the graphic shown above:
- Data objects with 3-D depth are used. These objects are hard to read. Furthermore, the graphical components added for 3-D depth do not convey any extra information (bad data ink ratio) [Few, 2004, p. 171].
- Through the use of pie charts, quantitative information is encoded by area. These types of graphs communicate poorly, because the human visual perception cannot accurately estimate the area of a 2-D shapes. In 3-D this is even harder [Few, 2004, p. 60].
- The numeric values are printed next to the categorical labels. This decreases the data-ink ratio. If we take into account the two points mentioned above, we can argue that the pie charts are non-data ink and only categorical labels and values are data ink.
- Except for "teachers" all pies are drawn in an intense color (highly saturated red). This draws a lot of attention to these pies, especially because red signals danger in most western cultures [Few, 2004, p. 171]. However, we think that the graphic's purpose is to highlight the proportion for "teachers". In that case the pie for "teachers" should be more intense [Few, 2004, p. 187].
- The categorical labels are printed in capitals. In this form text is less legible.
Improved Graphic
Improvements
Links
References
- [Few, 2004] Stephen Few. Show Me the Numbers - Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. Analytics Press, Oakland, CA, 2004.