<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://infovis-wiki.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Britta</id>
	<title>InfoVis:Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://infovis-wiki.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Britta"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/Britta"/>
	<updated>2026-06-20T18:47:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=VisWeek_V%26V&amp;diff=61693</id>
		<title>VisWeek V&amp;V</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=VisWeek_V%26V&amp;diff=61693"/>
		<updated>2011-11-01T12:45:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Britta: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;At [[VisWeek 2011]], Robert M. Kirby, Claudio T. Silva, Robert S. Laramee, and William Schroeder participated in a panel entitled &amp;quot;Verification in Visualization: Building a Common Culture&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slides used during the panel:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Kirby: [[Image:KirbyVisPanel2011.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Claudio&lt;br /&gt;
* Bob&lt;br /&gt;
* Schroeder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel was recorded and will be available at http://vgtc.org/ &amp;quot;soon&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by the discussions at this panel, the following people would like to organize an effort to facilitate V&amp;amp;V at future VisWeek submissions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Britta Weber&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Lebo&lt;br /&gt;
* (feel free to add your name)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few of us met for lunch immediately after the panel, and discussed a few points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SIGMOD has had something like it for 2 years, so we can borrow their model.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reproducibility takes (uncredited) time and effort; producing unreproducible papers is valued by the community.&lt;br /&gt;
* A grad student once published make files behind every published image - but stopped when he got a job.&lt;br /&gt;
* Publishing your code (without an established system) provides value because people grab it, use it, remember your name, and cite you in their publications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following people may provide useful suggestions for how to increase reproducibility within VisWeek publications:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Claudio T. Silva - knows about SIGMOD&#039;s effort.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gordon Kindlmann - was involved in Claudios efforts&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;make file&amp;quot; SCI student - because he cared about it enough to make make files.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.slideshare.net/anitawaard Anita de Waard]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related work&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.executablepapers.com/ by Elsevier&lt;br /&gt;
* http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2010/04/20/the-mythical-reproducibility-of-science/&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876290&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.openscience.org/blog/?p=306&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Britta</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>